Implementation of Heidegger's Angst into Buddhist Problem of Suffering: On How Buddhist Discourse Engenders and Epistemological Problem and How to Approach to it with Western Ontology

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32351/rca.v4.2.84
Política de Crossmark DOI: https://doi.org/10.32351/politica-crossmark

Keywords:

problem of suffering, four noble truths, Buddhism, early Buddhism, dukkha, Heidegger, angst, anguish

Abstract

Early Buddhist discourse recognizes the problem of dukkha (suffering) and argues that the cause of dukkha can be removed. This paper attempts to demonstrate how Buddhist claim that dukkha can be removed fails as it creates epistemological complications within the Buddhist discourse, and attempts to show how substituting Heidegger's concept of Angst for Buddhist concept of dukkha could solve this problem. It is argued that the solution proposed by the four noble truths of early Buddhist tradition contradicts with the ontological and epistemological properties and implications of the concept of dukkha, and, accordingly, these properties of dukkha ought to be revised. As a solution to this problem, it is proposed that Angst addresses the problem of suffering more efficiently by not engendering such epistemological complications while also retaining the philosophy and worldview created by the Buddhist discourse as it accurately facilitates the Buddhist perspective.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Ege Kaan Duman, Duke Kunshan University

    Ege Kaan Duman was born in November 1999, in Istanbul, Turkey. He currently studies Global Health and Biology at Duke Kunshan University (DKU), China as an undergraduate student with scholarship from Kunshan Government. Besides his studies, he also works as a research assistant in two different positions at DKU Global Health Research Center's Non-Communicable Diseases Team, and Global Infectious Diseases Laboratory while also conducting independent epidemiology and global health humanities research. Duman is also the founder and the president of DKU Philosophy Society and has a strong research interest in humanities.

References

Abelsen, P. (1993). Schopenhauer and Buddhism. Philosophy East and West, 43(2), 255-278. doi:10.2307/1399616

Gí¤b, S. (2015). Why do we Suffer? Buddhism and the Problem of Evil. Philosophy Compass(10/5), 345-353.

Heidegger, M. (1962). Sein und Zeit (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.): Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Kalupahana, D. J. (1977). The Notion of Suffering in Early Buddhism Compared with Some Reflections of Early Wittgenstein. Philosophy East and West, 27(4), 423-431. doi:10.2307/1397985

Levinas, E., & Committee of Public, S. (1996). Martin Heidegger and Ontology. Diacritics, 26(1), 11-32.

Orrí¹, M., & Wang, A. (1992). Durkheim, Religion, and Buddhism. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 31(1), 47-61. doi:10.2307/1386831

Schopenhauer, A. (2012). Ueber die vierfache Wurzel des Satzes vom zureichenden Grunde (D. E. Cartwright, E. E. Erdmann, & C. Janaway, Trans. C. Janaway Ed.). United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

Stambaugh, J. (1970). Commentary on Takeshi Umehara's "Heidegger and Buddhism". Philosophy East and West, 20(3), 283-286. doi:10.2307/1398309

Umehara, T. (1970). Heidegger and Buddhism. Philosophy East and West, 20(3), 271-281. doi:10.2307/1398308

Estadísticas de lectura: 1783

Descargas: PDF 746 - HTML 638 - XML 551 - EPUB 440
Ege Kaan Duman

Published

2019-10-17

How to Cite

Duman, E. K. (2019). Implementation of Heidegger’s Angst into Buddhist Problem of Suffering: On How Buddhist Discourse Engenders and Epistemological Problem and How to Approach to it with Western Ontology. MenteClara Foundation’s Peer-Reviewed Journal, 4(2), 7-17. https://doi.org/10.32351/rca.v4.2.84