Implementation of Heidegger's Angst into Buddhist Problem of Suffering: On How Buddhist Discourse Engenders and Epistemological Problem and How to Approach to it with Western Ontology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32351/rca.v4.2.84Keywords:
problem of suffering, four noble truths, Buddhism, early Buddhism, dukkha, Heidegger, angst, anguishAbstract
Early Buddhist discourse recognizes the problem of dukkha (suffering) and argues that the cause of dukkha can be removed. This paper attempts to demonstrate how Buddhist claim that dukkha can be removed fails as it creates epistemological complications within the Buddhist discourse, and attempts to show how substituting Heidegger's concept of Angst for Buddhist concept of dukkha could solve this problem. It is argued that the solution proposed by the four noble truths of early Buddhist tradition contradicts with the ontological and epistemological properties and implications of the concept of dukkha, and, accordingly, these properties of dukkha ought to be revised. As a solution to this problem, it is proposed that Angst addresses the problem of suffering more efficiently by not engendering such epistemological complications while also retaining the philosophy and worldview created by the Buddhist discourse as it accurately facilitates the Buddhist perspective.
Downloads
References
Abelsen, P. (1993). Schopenhauer and Buddhism. Philosophy East and West, 43(2), 255-278. doi:10.2307/1399616
Gí¤b, S. (2015). Why do we Suffer? Buddhism and the Problem of Evil. Philosophy Compass(10/5), 345-353.
Heidegger, M. (1962). Sein und Zeit (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.): Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Kalupahana, D. J. (1977). The Notion of Suffering in Early Buddhism Compared with Some Reflections of Early Wittgenstein. Philosophy East and West, 27(4), 423-431. doi:10.2307/1397985
Levinas, E., & Committee of Public, S. (1996). Martin Heidegger and Ontology. Diacritics, 26(1), 11-32.
Orrí¹, M., & Wang, A. (1992). Durkheim, Religion, and Buddhism. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 31(1), 47-61. doi:10.2307/1386831
Schopenhauer, A. (2012). Ueber die vierfache Wurzel des Satzes vom zureichenden Grunde (D. E. Cartwright, E. E. Erdmann, & C. Janaway, Trans. C. Janaway Ed.). United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Stambaugh, J. (1970). Commentary on Takeshi Umehara's "Heidegger and Buddhism". Philosophy East and West, 20(3), 283-286. doi:10.2307/1398309
Umehara, T. (1970). Heidegger and Buddhism. Philosophy East and West, 20(3), 271-281. doi:10.2307/1398308
Estadísticas de lectura: 1783
Descargas: PDF 746 - HTML 638 - XML 551 - EPUB 440
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:
a. Authors publish under a Creative Commons Acknowledgment 4.0 International license that allows others to share the work with an authorship acknowledgment of the work and the initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors, who retain their rights after publication, are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (for example, in institutional repositories or on their own website) before and during the submission process, as it may result in productive exchanges as well as earlier and greater citations of published works (See The Effect of Open Access).
Since November 1st, 2018, all articles published in this journal are available under a Creative Commons Acknowledgment 4.0 International license.
View the 