Tutorías universitarias en México: alcances y límites de la evidencia para atribuir efectos educativos. Una revisión integrativa crítica desde el marco CIPRA

Mario Guadalupe López Ayala; Israel Osuna Flores

doi:10.32351/rca.v11.455

Authors

Mario Guadalupe López Ayala Autonomous University of the West https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5377-6257
Israel Osuna Flores Autonomous Indigenous University of Mexico https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0199-2983

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32351/rca.v11.455

Política de Crossmark DOI: https://doi.org/10.32351/politica-crossmark

Keywords:

university tutoring, higher education, program evaluation, inferential reach, student persistence, evidence, CIPRA

Abstract

Institutional tutoring programs have become an established student-support strategy in Mexican higher education. Their expansion has been associated with reducing course failure, academic delay and dropout, strengthening educational trajectories, and extending support toward personal, socio-emotional, professional and institutional dimensions. Yet program existence, coverage, actual participation, observed outcomes and the capacity to attribute those outcomes to an intervention represent different levels of evidence that are not always distinguished in the literature. This article critically examines the inferential reach of the available evidence on university tutoring in Mexico and assesses the extent to which it progresses from documenting institutional presence toward supporting attribution of outcomes. A critical integrative review was conducted based on Whittemore and Knafl (2005), Torraco (2005, 2016), Hopia et al. (2016), and Snyder (2019). The empirical analytical corpus comprised 14 verifiable Mexican studies published between 2012 and 2026 and was complemented by conceptual, methodological and international literature. Methodological quality was examined using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, MMAT 2018, when compatible with the study design, without calculating overall quality scores. The synthesis generated CIPRA —Coverage, Implementation, Participation, Results and Attribution— as a framework for classifying the inferential reach of evidence rather than as a hierarchy of research designs or a causal sequence. Eight of the 14 studies (57.1%) reached Participation as their highest inferential level, three (21.4%) Implementation and three (21.4%) Results; none convincingly reached Attribution. Methodological appraisal revealed important strengths but also recurrent non-probability sampling, cross-sectional designs, institution-specific contexts, limited control of confounding and scarcity of comparison groups. The findings suggest that Mexican research has progressed further in documenting program operation and tutoring experiences than in identifying effects attributable to the intervention itself. International research on mentoring and peer mentoring reveals comparable challenges of conceptual definition, measurement and effectiveness assessment. The article concludes that the next challenge for the field is not merely to expand coverage, but to produce evidence capable of establishing what changes, for whom, under which conditions and with what degree of certainty such changes can be attributed to tutoring.

23 16

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Mario Guadalupe López Ayala, Autonomous University of the West

Mario Guadalupe López Ayala is a Mexican university professor and researcher. He holds doctoral degrees in Educational Innovation and Administration and in Psychopedagogy. He is affiliated with Universidad Autónoma de Occidente and Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa, Mexico. His scholarly work integrates human-centered artificial intelligence, socio-technical systems, applied psychology, educational innovation, and AI governance. His research examines the intersections of technology, cognition, human behavior, and institutional transformation, with particular attention to their social and ethical implications. He is an author and co-author of scientific publications, leads the Human-Centered AI & Socio-Technical Systems Lab, and develops research and science communication initiatives through Phoenix24, fostering knowledge generation and its transfer to society.
Israel Osuna Flores, Autonomous Indigenous University of Mexico

Dr. Osuna is currently a Professor-Researcher at the Autonomous Indigenous University of Mexico (UNAM), affiliated with the Biotechnology Engineering Program at both the Virtual Unit and the Mochicahui Unit. He recently received an honorary doctorate from the International Organization for Inclusion and Quality Education (OIICE). He has held various positions, including Administrative Analyst and Reviewer at the National Aquaculture and Fisheries Commission; advisor to the company Acuícola Gilberto, S.C. de C.V., R.L.; and columnist for the online newspaper Phoenix Medios. He is currently the Coordinator of the Biotechnology Engineering Program (Virtual Unit) at UNAM. He teaches courses in Biology, Social and Solidarity Economy, Introduction to Biotechnology, Community Engagement Awareness, and Information Management Tools. He was Coordinator of the Projects Department at the Technology Transfer Office of the Autonomous Indigenous University of Mexico and is a member of the Sinaloa System of Researchers and Technologists. He has also been a Professor-Researcher at the same institution, where he taught courses in the Bachelor's Degree in Forestry Engineering and Sustainable Development (Forest Entomology, Biodiversity, Thesis Seminar, Environmental Projection, and Project Formulation and Evaluation), as well as in the Graduate Program in Sciences in Sustainable Development of Natural Resources (Aquaculture Production, Environmental Pollution, and Ecotoxicology). He has directed and advised two undergraduate theses and monographs and three graduate theses and dissertations. He was a member of the Academic Group on Sustainable Development. His research experience focuses on adding value to agroforestry products, pollution, and environmental toxicology. He has published articles in JCR-indexed, peer-reviewed, and popular science journals. In addition, he participates in various scientific societies and has served as a project evaluator at events such as the Pacific Regional Science Fair and the National Science Fair. He was a member of the National System of Researchers (SNI) as a Candidate from July 2002 to December 2005 and received recognition from the CONACYT Repatriation Program in 1999. His professional experience includes leading several research and outreach projects funded by COSNET and SECIHTI, as well as holding various academic and administrative positions, including: Head of the Toxic Waste Laboratory at the Center for Research in Food and Development, A.C. (Delicias Unit), and Director of Research at the Autonomous Indigenous University of Mexico (UNAM). He has been a candidate for Rector of UNAM in Los Mochis, Sinaloa, Mexico, on three occasions (2017, 2021, and 2025). He has also worked at the National Technological Institute of Mexico (Los Mochis Campus), the University of the Sea, the Autonomous University of the West, the University of Guadalajara and the Center for Research in Food and Development, A.C. (Delicias Unit), where he has developed research projects and taught courses related to Fisheries Biology, Fisheries Technology, Ecology, Zoology, Aquaculture, Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology.

References

Angulo Moreno, Á. de J. (2021). Indicadores de la tutoría integral desde la percepción de los estudiantes de universidades públicas de México. Dilemas Contemporáneos: Educación, Política y Valores, 8(2), artículo 4. https://doi.org/10.46377/dilemas.v8i2.2512

Angulo Moreno, Á. de J., González Barrón, L. M., & Fuentes Vega, M. de los Á. (2025). Perspectivas del estudiantado universitario sobre la tutoría integral universitaria: propuestas para su institucionalización. Espacio I+D, Innovación más Desarrollo, 14(40), 45–66. https://espacioimasd.unach.mx/index.php/Inicio/article/view/441

Angulo Moreno, Á. de J., & Urbina Barrera, F. (2021). Implementación y retos de la tutoría integral: indicadores y percepción de estudiantes en tres universidades del norte de México. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Educativos, 51(3), 201–229. https://doi.org/10.48102/rlee.2021.51.3.393

Asociación Nacional de Universidades e Instituciones de Educación Superior. (2000). Programas institucionales de tutoría: una propuesta de la ANUIES para su organización y funcionamiento en las instituciones de educación superior (2.ª ed.). https://books.google.com/books?id=SOgQAAAAYAAJ

Astin, A. W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25(4), 297–308. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1985-18630-001

Astudillo Torres, M. P., & Chévez Ponce, F. (2018). Valoración de la tutoría en el devenir de la formación universitaria. Education in the Knowledge Society, 19(3), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks20181931535

Cahapay, M. B. (2021). Kirkpatrick model: Its limitations as used in higher education evaluation. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 8(1), 135–144. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.856143

De la Cruz Flores, G. (2018). Tutoría en educación superior: análisis desde diferentes corrientes psicológicas e implicaciones prácticas. CPU-e, Revista de Investigación Educativa, (25), 34–59. https://doi.org/10.25009/cpue.v0i25.2537

De la Cruz Flores, G., Chehaybar y Kury, E., & Abreu, L. F. (2011). Tutoría en educación superior: una revisión analítica de la literatura. Revista de la Educación Superior, 40(157), 189–209. https://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/resu/v40n157/v40n157a9.pdf

García López, R. I., Cuevas Salazar, O., Vales García, J. J., & Cruz Medina, I. R. (2012). Impacto del Programa de Tutoría en el desempeño académico de los alumnos del Instituto Tecnológico de Sonora. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 14(1), 106–121. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/155/15523175007.pdf

Guerreiro, M., & de Jesus, S. N. (2025). The role of peer mentoring program elements in promoting academic success and preventing student dropout in higher education: A systematic literature review. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 49(5), 671–687. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2025.2484768

Hong, Q. N., Fàbregues, S., Bartlett, G., Boardman, F., Cargo, M., Dagenais, P., Gagnon, M.-P., Griffiths, F., Nicolau, B., O’Cathain, A., Rousseau, M.-C., Vedel, I., & Pluye, P. (2018). The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers. Education for Information, 34(4), 285–291. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-180221

Hong, Q. N., Pluye, P., Fàbregues, S., Bartlett, G., Boardman, F., Cargo, M., Dagenais, P., Gagnon, M.-P., Griffiths, F., Nicolau, B., O’Cathain, A., Rousseau, M.-C., & Vedel, I. (2019). Improving the content validity of the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool: A modified e-Delphi study. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 111, 49–59.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.03.008

Hopia, H., Latvala, E., & Liimatainen, L. (2016). Reviewing the methodology of an integrative review. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 30(4), 662–669. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12327

Medina Lozano, A., Amador Ortiz, C. M., & Flores Castañeda, A. K. (2025). Programa de Tutoría entre Pares como estrategia para reducir la reprobación y deserción en instituciones de educación superior. RIDE. Revista Iberoamericana para la Investigación y el Desarrollo Educativo, 15(30), e852. https://doi.org/10.23913/ride.v15i30.2332

Nabi, G., Walmsley, A., Mir, M., & Osman, S. (2025). The impact of mentoring in higher education on student career development: A systematic review and research agenda. Studies in Higher Education, 50(4), 739–755. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2354894

Narro Robles, J., & Arredondo Galván, M. (2013). La tutoría: un proceso fundamental en la formación de los estudiantes universitarios. Perfiles Educativos, 35(141), 132–151. https://doi.org/10.22201/iisue.24486167e.2013.141.40528

Nuis, W., Segers, M., & Beausaert, S. (2023). Conceptualizing mentoring in higher education: A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 41, 100565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100565

Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic evaluation. SAGE Publications. https://us2.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/realistic-evaluation/book2052

Ponce Ceballos, S., Aceves Villanueva, Y., & Aviña Camacho, I. (2021). La evaluación de tutores académicos universitarios: una revisión del estado de la investigación desde instituciones mexicanas. Acta Universitaria, 31, e3134. https://doi.org/10.15174/au.2021.3134

Ponce Ceballos, S., García Cabrero, B., Romo López, A. M., & Aviña Camacho, I. (2022). Caracterización de los instrumentos de evaluación de tutores universitarios en México. Perfiles Educativos, 44(176), 45–64. https://doi.org/10.22201/iisue.24486167e.2022.176.60253

Ponce Ceballos, S., Martínez Iñiguez, J. E., & Moreno Salto, I. (2022). Recomendaciones para la tutoría académica en tiempos de contingencia. RIDE. Revista Iberoamericana para la Investigación y el Desarrollo Educativo, 13(25). https://doi.org/10.23913/ride.v13i25.1240

Reynosa Martínez, L. A., Moreno Treviño, J. O., & Camacho Gómez, A. (2026). Percepción estudiantil sobre el programa institucional de tutorías de la UANL: ¿Estamos haciendo lo suficiente? RIDE. Revista Iberoamericana para la Investigación y el Desarrollo Educativo, 16(32), e1068. https://doi.org/10.23913/ride.v16i32.2889

Roa Rivera, R. I. (2023). La tutoría académica universitaria en tiempos de COVID-19: oferta y promoción de los servicios educativos y apoyos institucionales. RIDE. Revista Iberoamericana para la Investigación y el Desarrollo Educativo, 14(27). https://doi.org/10.23913/ride.v14i27.1686

Rojas Larios, F., Figueroa Figueroa, G. S., & Gallegos Venegas, N. (2025). Identificación temprana de estudiantes en riesgo de reprobación mediante la tutoría y su impacto académico. Espacio I+D, Innovación más Desarrollo, 14(40), 31–43. https://espacioimasd.unach.mx/index.php/Inicio/article/view/440

Sánchez Martínez, F. E., Barrera Cámara, R. A., & Canepa Sáenz, A. (2020). Estudio evaluativo del Sistema Institucional de Tutorías para el seguimiento de trayectorias escolares. RIDE. Revista Iberoamericana para la Investigación y el Desarrollo Educativo, 10(20). https://doi.org/10.23913/ride.v10i20.609

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Stufflebeam, D. L., & Zhang, G. (2017). The CIPP evaluation model: How to evaluate for improvement and accountability. Guilford Press. https://books.google.com.mx/books/about/The_CIPP_Evaluation_Model.html?id=5lTLDAAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y

Sunza-Chan, S. P., & Sansores-Sabido, M. F. (2023). Tutoría de acompañamiento académico desde la virtualidad en tiempos de COVID-19: experiencias de transformación en el nivel superior. Revista de Estudios y Experiencias en Educación, 22(50), 317–335. https://doi.org/10.21703/rexe.v22i50.1729

Tinto, V. (2012). Completing college: Rethinking institutional action. University of Chicago Press. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/C/bo5514387.html

Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484305278283

Torraco, R. J. (2016). Writing integrative literature reviews: Using the past and present to explore the future. Human Resource Development Review, 15(4), 404–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484316671606

Verdugo García, E. M., del Castillo Correa, G., Serafio Fragoso, F. A., & Morales Covarrubias, M. del R. (2026). El impacto de la tutoría en la reducción de los índices de deserción y reprobación en el TecNM Campus Guaymas, período agosto-diciembre 2019 a agosto-diciembre 2023. Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar, 10(1), 2050–2064. https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v10i1.22344

Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x