BIOTECHNOLOGY IN INDIGENOUS COMMUNITIES: OPPORTUNITIES, ETHICAL CHALLENGES AND SUSTAINABILITY

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32351/rca.v11.451
Política de Crossmark DOI: https://doi.org/10.32351/politica-crossmark

Keywords:

intercultural bioethics, biopiracy, traditional knowledge, community participation, data sovereignty

Abstract

Biotechnology is considered a pillar of current scientific and technological development, and its implementation in indigenous communities poses ethical, social, and environmental challenges that require critical and contextualized analysis. This article aims to analyze the relationship between biotechnology and indigenous peoples, with emphasis on Latin America and Mexico, through a qualitative methodology based on a documentary review supported by critical-interpretive analysis of the scientific literature published between 2015 and 2026, aside from a few exceptions involving foundational works. It examines specific applications such as the conservation of native species, ecosystem restoration, sustainable agriculture, and genomics applied to health and territory. It also presents cases from indigenous communities, such as the Tzeltal and Tzotzil peoples in Chiapas and the Nahua peoples in Puebla, as well as experiences in Latin America (the Ecuadorian Amazon and Chimborazo), which reveal both potential benefits and existing tensions. Among the challenges identified are biopiracy, violations of free, prior, and informed consent, asymmetries in benefit-sharing mechanisms, and the persistence of colonial approaches in scientific research. The article incorporates new governance frameworks such as the Cali Fund for Digital Sequence Information (COP16) and the C.A.R.E. Principles of Indigenous Data Sovereignty. It concludes that biotechnology can effectively contribute to sustainable development when it is based on the principles of justice, effective community participation, and respect for cultural autonomy, and that co-design approaches integrating scientific and traditional knowledge are required.

195 159

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Israel Osuna Flores, Autonomous Indigenous University of Mexico

    Dr. Osuna is currently a Professor-Researcher at the Autonomous Indigenous University of Mexico (UNAM), affiliated with the Biotechnology Engineering Program at both the Virtual Unit and the Mochicahui Unit. He recently received an honorary doctorate from the International Organization for Inclusion and Quality Education (OIICE). He has held various positions, including Administrative Analyst and Reviewer at the National Aquaculture and Fisheries Commission; advisor to the company Acuícola Gilberto, S.C. de C.V., R.L.; and columnist for the online newspaper Phoenix Medios. He is currently the Coordinator of the Biotechnology Engineering Program (Virtual Unit) at UNAM. He teaches courses in Biology, Social and Solidarity Economy, Introduction to Biotechnology, Community Engagement Awareness, and Information Management Tools. He was Coordinator of the Projects Department at the Technology Transfer Office of the Autonomous Indigenous University of Mexico and is a member of the Sinaloa System of Researchers and Technologists. He has also been a Professor-Researcher at the same institution, where he taught courses in the Bachelor's Degree in Forestry Engineering and Sustainable Development (Forest Entomology, Biodiversity, Thesis Seminar, Environmental Projection, and Project Formulation and Evaluation), as well as in the Graduate Program in Sciences in Sustainable Development of Natural Resources (Aquaculture Production, Environmental Pollution, and Ecotoxicology). He has directed and advised two undergraduate theses and monographs and three graduate theses and dissertations. He was a member of the Academic Group on Sustainable Development. His research experience focuses on adding value to agroforestry products, pollution, and environmental toxicology. He has published articles in JCR-indexed, peer-reviewed, and popular science journals. In addition, he participates in various scientific societies and has served as a project evaluator at events such as the Pacific Regional Science Fair and the National Science Fair. He was a member of the National System of Researchers (SNI) as a Candidate from July 2002 to December 2005 and received recognition from the CONACYT Repatriation Program in 1999. His professional experience includes leading several research and outreach projects funded by COSNET and SECIHTI, as well as holding various academic and administrative positions, including: Head of the Toxic Waste Laboratory at the Center for Research in Food and Development, A.C. (Delicias Unit), and Director of Research at the Autonomous Indigenous University of Mexico (UNAM). He has been a candidate for Rector of UNAM in Los Mochis, Sinaloa, Mexico, on three occasions (2017, 2021, and 2025). He has also worked at the National Technological Institute of Mexico (Los Mochis Campus), the University of the Sea, the Autonomous University of the West, the University of Guadalajara and the Center for Research in Food and Development, A.C. (Delicias Unit), where he has developed research projects and taught courses related to Fisheries Biology, Fisheries Technology, Ecology, Zoology, Aquaculture, Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology.

  • Arturo Rafael Armenta López, Autonomous Indigenous University of Mexico

    Agronomist specializing in Crop Protection. He holds Master’s and Doctoral degrees in Agricultural Sciences from the Valle del Fuerte Faculty of Agriculture at the Autonomous University of Sinaloa (UAS). He is currently conducting a postdoctoral fellowship in Agricultural Biotechnology at the Interdisciplinary Research Center for Integrated Regional Development (CIIDIR-IPN, Sinaloa Unit) of the National Polytechnic Institute, and serves as a professor in the Biotechnology Engineering program at the Virtual Unit of the Autonomous Indigenous University of Mexico (UAIM).
    His academic career focuses on the agroecological management of pests, with a particular emphasis on post-harvest grain management. He has published scientific articles in indexed national and international journals and presented findings at national and international conferences. Additionally, he has co-supervised undergraduate theses and reviewed papers for symposia, forums, and book chapters covering agriculture, biotechnology, and sustainability. He was recently recognized as a researcher by the Sinaloa System of Researchers and Technologists (SSIT).

  • Xavier Eduardo Verdugo Contreras, Autonomous Indigenous University of Mexico

    He holds a degree in Biology and has completed postgraduate studies at the Universidad Autónoma de Occidente. His area of specialization is phytosanitary health and agri-food safety. He currently works as a Specialized Phytosanitary Third-Party Inspector attached to an inspection unit approved by the General Directorate of Plant Health. He is also a professor in the Biotechnology Engineering program at the Virtual Unit of the Universidad Autónoma Indígena de México.

  • Estela Sañudo Ayala, Autonomous Indigenous University of Mexico

    She is a Biochemical Engineer and a graduate of the Los Mochis Institute of Technology. She holds postgraduate qualifications in the environmental field, having completed a Master of Science in Sustainability and Environmental Studies, with an academic focus on biotechnology, sustainability, and natural resource management. Currently, she works as a full-time professor at the Autonomous Indigenous University of Mexico (UAIM), based at the Mochicahui campus in El Fuerte, Sinaloa, where she also serves as the coordinator of the Biotechnology Engineering degree program. Her teaching experience spans various subjects across different academic programs and is complemented by her participation in curriculum redesign processes and virtual education initiatives. In the realm of research, she has collaborated on projects involving the utilization of organic waste and the production of humic substances to promote the growth of forestry-relevant plant species in northern Sinaloa. She has presented at national and international biotechnology conferences and has published scientific papers on plant physiology and germination. Furthermore, she has supervised undergraduate theses in forestry and biotechnology and has helped organize academic symposia, workshops, and science outreach activities. Her professional development includes courses and research stays covering topics such as carbon sequestration in forest ecosystems, environmental impact assessment, and the study of medicinal plants.

  • Mario Guadalupe López Ayala, Universidad Autónoma de Occidente, Autonomous University of the West

    Mario Guadalupe López Ayala is a Mexican university professor and researcher. He holds doctoral degrees in Educational Innovation and Administration and in Psychopedagogy. He is affiliated with Universidad Autónoma de Occidente and Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa, Mexico. His scholarly work integrates human-centered artificial intelligence, socio-technical systems, applied psychology, educational innovation, and AI governance. His research examines the intersections of technology, cognition, human behavior, and institutional transformation, with particular attention to their social and ethical implications. He is an author and co-author of scientific publications, leads the Human-Centered AI & Socio-Technical Systems Lab, and develops research and science communication initiatives through Phoenix24, fostering knowledge generation and its transfer to society.

References

Alarcón-Lavín, R. R. (2010). La biopiratería de los recursos de la medicina indígena tradicional en el Estado Chiapas, México: El caso ICBG-Maya. Revista Pueblos y Fronteras Digital, 5(10), 151–180. https://doi.org/10.22201/cimsur.18704115e.2010.10.149

Anderson, M. Z., Tsosie, K. S., Peters, C. L., Trinidad, S. B., McCartney, A., Fernandez, S., Dale, K. J., Perez Rivera, S., Banta, C., Bhattacharyya, O., Billy, J., Brennan, R., Cu:k Ba’ak, R., Dhein, K., Dickinson, R., Ducheneaux, G., Gerth, A., Hernandez-Hernandez, K., Howard, D. S., Parasidis, E., Thomas, N. A., & Yracheta, J. M. (2025). A Tribal data repository to advance Indigenous health and sovereignty. Nature Genetics, 57, 2614–2619. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-025-02382-0

Bellon, M. R., Mastretta-Yanes, A., Ponce-Mendoza, A., Ortiz-Santamaría, D., Oliveros-Galindo, O., Perales, H., Acevedo, F., & Sarukhán, J. (2018). Evolutionary and food supply implications of ongoing maize domestication by Mexican campesinos. Proceedings. Biological sciences, 285(1885), 20181049. https://teebweb.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/rspb.2018.1049.pdf

Bocco, G., Velázquez, A., & Torres, A. (2000). Ciencia, comunidades indígenas y manejo de recursos naturales. Un caso de investigación participativa en México. Interciencia, 25(2), 64–70. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/339/33904403.pdf

Carrillo-Pérez, E., Ruiz-Manríquez, A., & Yeomans-Reina, H. (2004). Aislamiento, identificación y evaluación de un cultivo mixto de microorganismos con capacidad para degradar DDT. Revista Internacional de Contaminación Ambiental, 20(2), 69–75. https://www.revistascca.unam.mx/rica/index.php/rica/article/view/23121

Chambers, R. (1994). Participatory rural appraisal (PRA): Analysis of experience. World Development, 22(9), 1253–1268. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(94)90003-5

Claw, K. G., Anderson, M. Z., Begay, R. L., Tsosie, K. S., Fox, K., & Garrison, N. A. (2018). A framework for enhancing ethical genomic research with Indigenous communities. Nature Communications, 9, 2957. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05188-3

Conforme-García, M. M., Dávila-Ulloa, M., Sarango-Ordóñez, J. P., & Medina-Gahona, G. A. (2024). Estrategias de Biotecnología Verde: Hacia una Recuperación Sostenible de Bosques Amazónicos. Código Científico Revista De Investigación, 5(E3), 119–144. https://doi.org/10.55813/gaea/ccri/v5/nE3/313

Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). (2025). Cali Fund operational framework: Decision adopted by the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity. CBD/COP/DEC/16/2. https://www.cbd.int/doc/decisions/cop-16/cop-16-dec-02-en.pdf

De la Garza & Camino, M. (2025). Genómica de poblaciones y tradición indígena. Dilemas éticos. Estudios de Cultura Maya, 66, 283–292. https://doi.org/10.19130/iifl.ecm.66.2025/fall-wint/1480

Edwards, N., McLester-Davis, L. W. Y., Kline, C., Brown, A., Caron, N. R., & Parr-Brownlie, L. C. (2025). Towards the implementation of Indigenous data governance in neurogenomics research. Nature Neuroscience, 28(12), 2171–2174. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-025-02070-6

Fondo para el Desarrollo de los Pueblos Indígenas de América Latina y el Caribe (FILAC). (2021). Pueblos indígenas deben ser actores claves en la ciencia, la tecnología y la innovación. https://www.filac.org/pueblos-indigenas-deben-ser-actores-claves-en-la-ciencia-la-tecnologia-y-la-innovacion/

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (2017). The future of food and agriculture: Trends and challenges. https://www.fao.org/3/i6583e/i6583e.pdf

Hernández-Vicente, P. O. (2025). La etnobiología y el impacto actual en los pueblos indígenas. Con Ciencia Serrana: Boletín Científico de la Escuela Preparatoria Ixtlahuaco, 7(13), 8–9. https://doi.org/10.29057/ixtlahuaco.v7i13.14068

Kasianov, A. (2024). [Acuerdo de acceso y distribución de beneficios de Basecamp Research con Camerún]. Basecamp Research. https://www.biopharmatrend.com/news/basecamp-research-partners-with-cameroon-to-share-benefits-from-genetic-data-use-in-landmark-agreement-904/

Keleman, A., Hellin, J., & Bellon, M. R. (2009). Maize diversity, rural development policy, and farmers’ practices: Lessons from Chiapas, Mexico. The Geographical Journal, 175(1), 52–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4959.2008.00314.x

Larqué-Saavedra, A. (2016). Biotecnología prehispánica en Mesoamérica. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas, 7(5), 1047–1060. https://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/rfm/v39n2/0187-7380-rfm-39-02-00107.pdf

LeBaron von Baeyer, C., et al. (2024). Why community consultation matters in genomic research benefit-sharing models. Frontiers in Genetics. . https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.278308.123

López-García, A., Gómez-Hernández, M., & Gándara, E. (2024). Variation in traditional knowledge of culturally important macromycete species among three indigenous communities of Oaxaca, Mexico. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 20, 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-024-00679-8

López, E., & Quintero-Jiménez, A. (2025). Implicaciones bioéticas en el uso de la biotecnología para la conservación de agaves en Hidalgo. Biotecnia, 27(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.18633/biotecnia.v27.2432

National Institutes of Health. (2025). Considerations for researchers working with Tribal communities: Sovereignty, ethics, and data-sharing issues. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://cascadiacopeshub.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/harding-et-al-conducting-research-with-tribal-communities-sovereignty-ethics-and-data-sharing-issues.pdf

Ortiz Monasterio Quintana, A. (2006). ¿Entre la espada y la pared? Conocimiento indígena y bioprospección en México. Ciencias, 83, 42–52. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/644/64408308.pdf

Osuna-Flores, I., & Sañudo-Ayala, E. (2024). Biotecnología Intercultural en México. Revista Propuesta Ambiental, 2(1), 32–41. Recuperado de: https://zenodo.org/records/14052354

Pankararu, C. J., Teixidor-Toneu, I., Odonne, G., Asante, F., Bandeira, S. O., Barrera-Bello, Á. M., Benitez-Capistros, F. J., Dahdouh-Guebas, F., Dalcin, E., Dennehy-Carr, Z. H., Diallo, K., Drouet-Cruz, H. T., Fonseca-Kruel, V. S., Gallois, S., Gnansounou, S. C., Hamza, A. J., Hugé, J., Jordan, F. M., Kalle, R., Khan, N. I., Kuijper, I., Levis, C., Lima, A. S., Mattalia, G., Milliken, W., Munga, C. N., Narchi, N. E., Ngeve, M. N., Ofori, S. A., Phartyal, S. S., Peroni, N., Pironon, S., Polanía, J., Prakofjewa, J., Toledo Silva, M., Sõukand, R., Thomas, M. B., Ulian, T., Uprety, Y., Vandebroek, I., Ximenes, A. C., Zank, S., & Hanazaki, N. (2026). A global biodiversity use data infrastructure acknowledging indigenous and local knowledge. npj Biodiversity, 5, 7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44185-026-00121-0

Pinhanez, C., Cavalin, P. R., Storto, L., Finbow, T., Cobbinah, A., Nogima, J., Vasconcelos, M., Domingues, P., de Souza Mizukami, P., Grell, N., Gongora, M., & Gonçalves, I. (2024). Harnessing the power of artificial intelligence to vitalize endangered Indigenous languages: Technologies and experiences. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2407.12620

Pretty, J. N. (1995). Participatory learning for sustainable agriculture. World Development, 23(8), 1247–1263. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(95)00046-F

Raíces Indígenas. (2024). Semillas del futuro: Biotecnología en el rescate de variedades indígenas. https://raicesindigenas.net/interseccion-con-la-tecnologia/semillas-futuro-biotecnologia-rescate-variedades-indigenas/

Red de Evaluación Social de Tecnologías en América Latina (Red TECLA). (2024). Evaluación de biotecnologías en comunidades campesinas e indígenas. https://www.biodiversidadla.org/Campanas-y-Acciones/Evaluacion-de-biotecnologias-en-comunidades-campesinas-e-indigenas

Roblada Mancilla, S. A., Gavilanes Santillán, L. A., González Gallegos, M. de L., González Figueroa, R., Cárdenas Rodríguez, E., & Heinze, A. (2024). Experiencias en el uso de bioinsumos para la salud y la regeneración ecosistémica y comunitaria. Enfoques Transdisciplinarios: Ciencia Y Sociedad, 2(2), 245-261. https://revistaenfoques.ciatej.mx/index.php/revistaenfoques/article/view/51

Rojas, D. D. A., & Nemogá, S. G. R. (2021). Bioética en los procesos de investigación y bioprospección: relaciones con pueblos indígenas y comunidades locales en Colombia. Revista Colombiana de Bioética, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.18270/rcb.v16i1.3249

Salceda, S. A., Desántolo, B., & Plischuk, M. (2015). Espacio de reflexión: el por qué y para quién de la investigación bioantropológica. Revista Argentina de Antropología Biológica, 17(2), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.17139/raab.2015.0017.02.06

Sardi, M. L., & Azpiroz-Cleñan, V. (2024). Ética, antropología biológica y pueblos indígenas: Reflexiones desde el diálogo de saberes. Revista Uruguaya de Antropología y Etnografía, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.29112/ruae.v9i2.2326

Silva-Flores, L. (2024). Innovación social y desarrollo local sostenible: el caso de la comunidad indígena de Tlajomulco. Estudios de la Gestión, (16). https://doi.org/10.32719/25506641.2024.16.1

Teran, M. Y. (2023). Los pueblos indígenas expresan su preocupación por la biología sintética. Cultural Survival Quarterly. https://www.culturalsurvival.org/es/publications/cultural-survival-quarterly/los-pueblos-indigenas-expresan-su-preocupacion-por-la

BIOTECHNOLOGY IN INDIGENOUS COMMUNITIES: OPPORTUNITIES, ETHICAL CHALLENGES AND SUSTAINABILITY

Published

2026-10-14

Issue

Section

Article

How to Cite

Osuna Flores, I., Armenta López, A. R., Verdugo Contreras, X. E., Sañudo Ayala, E., & López Ayala, M. G. (2026). BIOTECHNOLOGY IN INDIGENOUS COMMUNITIES: OPPORTUNITIES, ETHICAL CHALLENGES AND SUSTAINABILITY. MenteClara Foundation’s Peer-Reviewed Journal, 11, 451. https://doi.org/10.32351/rca.v11.451

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>