LEGITIMIZING RELIGION’S PLACE IN UNDERSTANDING THE HUMAN PERSON: AN EVIDENTIAL APPROACH TO INTERPRETING THE MEANINGFUL ROLE OF SACRED PLAY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32351/rca.v1.2.17Keywords:
Religion, sacred play, anthropology, psychology, human constitution, soul, mankind, communityAbstract
Religion on a more institutional level and spirituality in a more personally existential way is not a respecter of socio-economic status, limited to whether or not a country is developed, or fickle about where it takes root geographically. Even the “New Atheism” movement complies with pseudo-doctrines, proves zealous for deeply-rooted beliefs, and has even started meeting in what are called atheist “mega-churches.” It would seem that human beings are inclined to the phenomenon of organized religion and/or “sacred play” no matter what their backgrounds are or what historical localization they claim.
Though religion, theology, and the claims therein should be weighty in discussions concerning the human person, often these sciences are dismissed as secondary or even unnecessary. However, more are admitting that to understand mankind in general and the individual in particular, one must incorporate what these discussions afford. As Haslina Ibrahim (2008) rightly acknowledges, “to fully understand man, it is vital that we reconcile the study of religions with other sciences that fall under the study of humanities.”
To this end, this argument will build an evidential case for the pervasiveness of sacred play and call readers to understand something of its legitimacy in discussions of the human person. This will be accomplished by building a compendium of characteristics witnessed in the human person that are generally observed among social scientists and then connecting these both individually and collectively to the phenomenon of sacred play.
Downloads
References
Allport, G. W. (1950). The Individual and His Religions: A Psychological Interpretation. New York, MacMillan.
Ashbrook, J. B. (1989). The Human Brain and Human Destiny: A Pattern for Old Brain Empathy with the Emergence of Mind. Zygon 24, 335-356.
Beck, J. R., & Demarest, B. (2005). The Human Person in Theology and Psychology: Biblical Anthropology for the Twenty-First Century. Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel, 2005.
Brainbridge, W. S. (2007). Converging Technologies and Human Destiny. Journal of Medicine & Philosophy 32, 197-216.
Burhoe, R. W. (1977). What does Determine Human Destiny: Science Applied to Interpret Religion. Zygon 12, 336-389.
Cahoon, L. E. (1992). Limits of the Social and Relational Self. Selves, People, and Persons: What Does it Mean to Be a Self? Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Cohn, B. S. (1980). History and Anthropology: The State of Play. Comparative Studies in Society and History 22, 198.
Craffert, P. F. (2007). Jesus’ Resurrection in a Social-Scientific Perspective: Is there Anything New to be Said? Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus 7, 126-151.
Elkins, D. (1998). Beyond Religion: Eight Alternative Paths to the Sacred. Wheaton: Quest Books.
Emmons, R. A. (1999). The Psychology of Ultimate Concerns: Motivation and Spirituality in Personality. New York: Guilford Press.
Fitzgerald, H. E. & Barton, L. R. (2000). Infant Mental Health: Origins and Emergence of and Interdisciplinary Field. WAIMH Handbook of Infant and Mental Health. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Frankel, F., & Myatt, R. (2003) Children's Friendship Training. New York: Brunner-Routledge.
Freud, S. (1964). The Future of an Illusion. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
Fromm, Erich. (1950). Psychoanalysis and Religion. New York: Bantam.
Gehlen, A. (1958). Der Mensch 6th Ed. Bonn: Athenaum-Verlag.
Greggo, S. P. (2001). Souls Origins: How Do the Creationist and Traducianist Perspectives Hold-up to Current Trends in Developmental Psychology? Presentation at the Evangelical Theological Society annual meeting. Colorado Springs, CO.
Grinde, B. (1998). The Biology of Religion: A Darwinian Gospel. Journal of Social and Evolutionary Systems 21, 19-28.
Guardini, R. (1930). The Spirit of the Liturgy. Trans. A Lane. New York: Sheed & Ward.
Hill, P. C. (2002). Spiritual Transformation: Forming the Habitual Center of Personal Energy. Psychology of Religion Newsletter 26, 1-11.
Hoyle, R. H., Kernis, M. H. Mark, Leary, R., & Baldwin, M. W. (1999). Selfhood: Identity, Esteem, Regulation. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Mahler, M. S., Pine, F., & Bergman, A. (1975). The Psychological Birth of the Human Infant. New York Basic Books.
Maslow, A. (1971). The Farther Reaches of Human Nature. New York: Viking Press.
Merrell, K. W. (2003). Behavioral, Social, and Emotional Assessment of Children and Adolescents. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assocs.
Pannenberg, W. (1985). Anthropology in Theological Perspective. Trans by Matthew J. O’Connell. Philadelphia: Westminster.
Pannenberg, W. (1993). Systemativ Theology Vol. I. Translated by Geoffrey W. Bromiley. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
Pannenberg, W. (1977). What is Man?: A Contemporary Anthropology in Theological Perspective. Philadelphia: Fortress.
Pargament, K. I. (2007). Spiritually Integrated Psychotherapy: Understanding and Addressing the Sacred. New York: Guilford Press.
Piaget, J. (1972). Play, Dreams and Imitation in Childhood. Trans. C. Gattengo & F. M. Hodgson. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Rahner, H. (1965). Man at Play. Trans. B. Battershaw & E. Quinn. New York: Herder & Herder.
Scheler. (1960). On the Eternal in Man. Trans. B. Noble. New York: Harper.
Shults, L. (2003). Reforming Theological Anthropology: After the Philosophical Turn to Relationality. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
Skinner, B.F. (1971). Beyond Freedom and Dignity. Toronto: Bantam Vintage.
Tindale, R. S. (1998). Theory and Research on Small Groups. New York: Plenum Press.
Van Leeuwen, M. S. (1985). The Person in Psychology. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
Estadísticas de lectura: 1924
Descargas: PDF (SPANISH) 761 - HTML (SPANISH) 658 - XML (SPANISH) 644Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:
a. Authors publish under a Creative Commons Acknowledgment 4.0 International license that allows others to share the work with an authorship acknowledgment of the work and the initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors, who retain their rights after publication, are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (for example, in institutional repositories or on their own website) before and during the submission process, as it may result in productive exchanges as well as earlier and greater citations of published works (See The Effect of Open Access).
Since November 1st, 2018, all articles published in this journal are available under a Creative Commons Acknowledgment 4.0 International license.
View the 