Majoritarian Democracy Reassessed
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32351/rca.v5.145Keywords:
majoritarian democracy, ethnicity, community cohesion, religious unityAbstract
This paper attempts to show that while fear of democracy turning into a ‘majoritarian’ system is rational, it is not always realistic because of the inherent inconsistencies in the idea of ‘community cohesion’. Traditional notion of community, constituted by oneness of race, religion, culture or caste, has been seriously contested by upsurge of ‘salad bowl’ multicultural societies comprising assortment of races, cultures and religions. Even as the trajectories of modern democracies appear to foreground the ethnicisation of its politics, it does not amount to a full-fledged ethnicisation of the communities at large. A thoroughly united community, if there is one, looks real only in the realm of imagination.Downloads
References
Bloemraad, I., Korteweg, A., & Yurdakul, G. (2008). Citizenship and Immigration: Multiculturalism, Assimilation, and Challenges to the Nation-state. The Annual Review of Sociology, 153-179.
Borooah, V., Sabharwal, N., Diwakar, D., Mishra, V., & Naik, A. (2015). Caste, Discrimination, and Exclusion in Modern India. Sage Publications. (s.f.).
Fazl, T. (06 de September de 2006). Dereserve These Myths. The Indian Express.
Hardin, R. (1990). Public Choice Vs. Democracy. Nomos, Vol. 32, Majorities and Minorities, 184-203.
Kymlicka, W., & Bashir, B. (2008). Introduction: Struggles for Inclusion and Reconciliation in Modern Democracies. En W. Kymlicka, & B. Bashir, The Politics of Reconciliation in Multicultural Societies (pág. 258). London: Oxford University Press.
Lee, S. (2001). A Paradox of Democracy. Public Affairs Quarterly, Vol. 15. No. 3, 261-269.
Levitsky, S. y Ziblatt, D. (2018). Cómo mueren las democracias . Vikingo. (s.f.).
Lijphart, A. (1996). The Puzzle of Indian Democracy: A Consociational Interpretation. The American Political Science Review, Vol. 90, No. 2 (Jun., 1996), 258-268.
Mill, J. S. (2010). Considerations on Representative Government. Cambridge University Press.
Morreau, M. (2016). Arrow's Theorem. En E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition).
Patra, A. (15 de April de 2006). Five Myths about Muslim Vote. The Hindu.
Rousseau, J. J. (1993). Social Contract. Everyman.
Sen, A. (1979). Collective Choice and Social Welfare. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Shakir, M. (1990). Congress and Minority Vote. En R. Roy, & S. Sissions, Diversity and Dominance in Indian Politics, Vol.II. New Delhi: Sage.
Shankaran, K. P. (30 de January de 2019). Tyranny of the majority. The Indian Express.
Verma, R., & Gupta, P. (31 de December de 2016). Facts and Fiction about How Muslims Vote in India - Evidence from Uttar Pradesh. Economic and Political Weekly. Vol. LI. No. 53, págs. 110-116.
Waghmare, B. S. (2010). Reservation Policy and the Plight of Matangs in Maharashtra. The Indian Journal of Political Science, Vol. 71. No. 3 (JULY - SEPT)., 923-946.
Estadísticas de lectura: 1702
Descargas: PDF 801 - HTML 935 - XML 470 - EPUB 487
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:
a. Authors publish under a Creative Commons Acknowledgment 4.0 International license that allows others to share the work with an authorship acknowledgment of the work and the initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors, who retain their rights after publication, are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (for example, in institutional repositories or on their own website) before and during the submission process, as it may result in productive exchanges as well as earlier and greater citations of published works (See The Effect of Open Access).
Since November 1st, 2018, all articles published in this journal are available under a Creative Commons Acknowledgment 4.0 International license.
View the 