KULARNAVA TANTRA - PATHWAY FOR MEANING CIRCULATION

Authors

  • Beatriz Valdez Universidad Central de Venezuela

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32351/rca.v1.1.13
Política de Crossmark DOI: https://doi.org/10.32351/politica-crossmark

Keywords:

Textual graphs, Kularnava Tantra, Textual networks, Semantics, Speech, Narrative, System, Structure, Context, Interpretation, Display, Diagram, R-project, Gephi

Abstract

I have read through the Kularnava Tantra in a non-linear fashion using a text network approach. I previously extracted the graph from the text with R, and I then visualized and analyzed it with Gephi. The analysis was based on the metrics developed by graphs theory and applied following the same procedure as for analyzing empirical social networks. I identified the pathway for meaning circulation within the Kularnava, its main agenda, which stated that the guru is crucial to facilitate the discovery of our inner self. For this purpose, he uses knowledge tools as well as the desire for Shakti.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Beatriz Valdez, Universidad Central de Venezuela

    Escuela de Sociología, catedra: Planificación; Análisis de datos para la planificación estratégica y en el Centro de Estudios del Desarrollo de la Universidad Central de Venezuela, CENDES, en el área de Teoría y Métodos de la Planificación Egresada del CENDES; como Magister Scientiarum en Planificación del Desarrollo. Estudiante del Doctorado en Estudios del Desarrollo en este mismo Centro de Estudios.

References

Alexa, M. (1997). Computer-Assisted Text Analysis Methodology in the Social Science. Mannheim: Zuma.

Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Austin: University of Texas Press .

Bakhtin, M., & Emerson, C. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky's poetics. Minneapolis: University of Minessotta Press.

Batagelj , V., de Nooy, A., & Mrvar, A. (2011). Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Brandes, U., Eiglsperger, M., Herman, I., Himsolt, M., & Marshall, M. S. (2002). GraphML progress report structural layer proposal. Graph Drawing, 501-512.

Bruce, B., & Newman, D. (1978). Interacting plans". Cognitive Science, 195-233.

Carley, K. (1993). Coding choices for textual analysis: A comparison of content analysis and map analysis. Sociological Methodology , 75-126.

Chartrand, G. (1985). Introductory Graph Theory. New York: Dover.

Clifford E., W. (2014). The Plot of the Plot: Graphs and Visualizations. The Journal of Modern Periodical Studies , 94-109.

Csardi, G., & Nepusz, T. (2006). The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJournal Complex Systems, 16-95.

Diesner, J. (2012). Uncovering and managing the impact of methodological choices for the computational construction of socio-technical networks from texts. Pittsburgh: Carnegie Mellon University. School of Computer Science.

Dyer, M. G. (1983). The Role of Affect in Narratives. Cognitive Science, 211-242.

Feinerer, I., Hornik, K., & Meyer, D. (2008). Text Mining Infrastructure in R. Journal of Statistical Software , 1-54.

Gephi Consortium. (2011). Gephi Tutorial Layouts. Gephi .

Giudici E., R., & Bris Lluch, A. (1997). Introducción a la teoría de grafos. Caracas: Ediciones de la Universidad Simón Bolívar.

Jacomy, M., Bastian, M., & Heymann, S. (2009). Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. ICWSM, 361-362.

Lehnert, W. G. (1981). Plot units and narrative summarization. Cognitive Science , 293-331.

Lewin, K. (2013). Principles of Topological Psychology. Worcestershire: Read Books ltd.

Lok, S., & Feiner, S. (n.d.). A Survey of Automated Layout Techniques for Information. New York: Dept. of Computer Science.

Morris, P. (Ed.). (1994). The Bakhtin's Reader. Selected Writings of Bakhtin, Medvedev and Voloshinov. London.

Nodus Lab. (2012). Exploring the spatial distribution of narrative structures. Retrieved from Text Atlas: http://textatlas.tumblr.com/

Pandit, M. P. (1980). Kularnava Tantra. Rito de las cinco cosas prohibidas. Editorial Eyras.

Paranyushkin, D. (2010). Text Network Analysis. Retrieved 2012, from http://issuu.com/deemeetree/docs/text-network-analysis

Paranyushkin, D. (2011). Identifying the pathways for meaning circulation using text network analysis. Retrieved 2012, from Nodus Lab: http://noduslabs.com/research/pathways-meaning-circulation-text-network-analysis/

Paranyushkin, D. (2011). Visualization of text's polysingularity using network analysis. Prototype Letters, 256-278.

R Core Team. (2015). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. RCT2015.

Ryan, M.-L. (2007). Diagramming narrative. Semiotica, 11-40.

Solé, R., Corominas Murtra, B., Valverde, S., & Steels, L. (2010). Language Networks: their structure, function and evolution. Complexity, 20-26.

Tamassia, R. (Ed.). (2013). Handbook of Graph Drawing and Visualization. CRC Press.

Estadísticas de lectura: 5049

Descargas: PDF (SPANISH) 1355 - HTML (SPANISH) 1043 - XML (SPANISH) 1171
Kularnava Tantra, editorial Eiras

Published

2016-01-18

How to Cite

Valdez, B. (2016). KULARNAVA TANTRA - PATHWAY FOR MEANING CIRCULATION. MenteClara Foundation’s Peer-Reviewed Journal, 1(1), 227-247. https://doi.org/10.32351/rca.v1.1.13