Sociopolitical models in dispute. The case of Huawei's Comercial ban
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32351/rca.v4.2.105Keywords:
digital innovation, sociopolitical models, interenet of thingsAbstract
It cannot be clearly established how digital development will shape the economic and social relations of the interconnected world, especially in view of the imminent revolution coupled with the emergence of 5G networks and IoT. What is clear is that the values and pillars under which they are grounded are in open discussion and dispute. In this brief communication, taking the current commercial and technological confrontation between the United States and Huawei as a starting point, we will try to identify two confronted sociopolitical models that resolve in their own way the axis of relationships between individuals, governments and tech companies.
In particular, it will delve into the recognition of two different scenarios. On the one hand, the West, where large companies such as Google and Facebook are systematically questioned by civil, judicial and political spheres, while they deal with important accusations of unfair competition and manipulation of private data; and, on the other hand, China, where the authorities «protect» their 800 million Internet users for the exploitation of a few companies in what can be understood as a dangerous model of vertical integration.
Downloads
References
Byung-Chul, H. (2014). Psicopolítica. Neoliberalismo y nuevas técnicas de poder. Barcelona: Herder.
Floridi, L. (2002). The 4th. Revolution. New York: Oxford University Press.
Galup, L. (2019). Big data y política. Buenos Aires: Ediciones B.
Latour, B. (1999). Pandora’s hope. Essays on the reality of science studies. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Portmess, L., & Tower, S. (2015). Data barns, ambient intelligence and cloud computing: the tacit epistemology and linguistic representation of Big Data. Ethics and Information Technology, 17(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-014-9357-2
Rifkin, J. (1996). El fin del trabajo. https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_ais/ais.19976131
Ritzer, G. (2014). Prosumption: Evolution, revolution, or eternal return of the same? Journal of Consumer Culture, 14(1), 3-24.
Sequeira, N. (2019). What 5G means for the future of the Internet of Things. ECN Magazine. https://www.ecnmag.com/blog/2019/01/what-5g-means-future-internet-things
Swanson, A., Mozur, P. (2019). Trump fusiona sus amenazas económicas y de seguridad nacional para presionar a aliados. The New York Times (ES). https://www.nytimes.com/es/2019/06/10/aranceles-trump-seguridad-nacional
Estadísticas de lectura: 2007
Descargas: PDF (SPANISH) 701 - HTML (SPANISH) 514 - XML (SPANISH) 456 - EPUB (SPANISH) 430
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:
a. Authors publish under a Creative Commons Acknowledgment 4.0 International license that allows others to share the work with an authorship acknowledgment of the work and the initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors, who retain their rights after publication, are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (for example, in institutional repositories or on their own website) before and during the submission process, as it may result in productive exchanges as well as earlier and greater citations of published works (See The Effect of Open Access).
Since November 1st, 2018, all articles published in this journal are available under a Creative Commons Acknowledgment 4.0 International license.
View the 